Rivals of Jesus

November 30, 2006 By: erik Category: Complaining, Musings, Religion, Reviews, USA 2,815 views

Rate this post:
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (4 votes, average: 3.00 out of 5)
Loading...Loading...

I’ve just watched two of three National Geographic documentaries that I’ve recently “acquired”, collectively called “The Secret Bible”.

The first one was about the Knights Templar and consisted almost entirely of speculation, and no facts that I (or anyone that’s read or seen The Da Vinci Code) didn’t already know.1 Part two was called “Rivals of Jesus”, and talked about the other cult religions that competed with Christianity throughout the first three centuries (a time scale arbitrarily defined by the success of Christiantity, of course).

Unfortunately, I can’t find much about the series beyond links such as:

http://www.nationalgeographic.co.uk/watch/series_details.aspx?id_series=214
http://www.guardian.co.uk/TV/nationalgeographicdigital.html

Frankly, I’m not surprised that such “heresy” can’t be found on American television.

Despite the eye-opening “Jesus wasn’t the only ‘messiah’ who was born on December 25th and rose from the dead after three days???” message of the documentary, I must say that I am quite appalled at the kind of historian (all with conspicuous American accents) that claims that a document written 50 or 70 years after events occur can be considered truthful. All of the sources for the information about Jesus’ life in the documentary are taken from the New Testament. Keep in mind that this is the equivalent of my blog being the only written detailed account of the lives of Winston Churchill or Arthur Conan Doyle, who died in 1965 and 1930, respectively. And this is in an age of illiteracy, when I certainly wouldn’t have read anything by a biographer or historian from their era.

Without putting into context the writers which you are using for your “facts”, you are simply being a bad historian if you quote me for information about someone who died 76 years ago. Despite this hugely Christian bias, did you know that the following rituals/beliefs did not originate from Christianity, but, in fact, were adopted by Christianity in order to recruit new members?

  • The virgin birth of the Messiah
  • Three kings bearing gifts at the Messiah’s birth (Merry Christmas, by the way)
  • The ritual consumption of bread and wine to represent the body and blood of the Messiah
  • The birth on December 25th
  • The crucifixion
  • The image of mother (Mary) with baby (Jesus) in her arms
  • The parading of the above motherly image at Easter, the Spring equinox (still popular in Catholic countries, such as Spain)
  • The resurrection after three days
  • The body of the Messiah rising into the sky, leaving no evidence of earthly existence
  • The Messiah as the son of God
  • No news about the Messiah between childhood and adulthood
  • The Messiah dies at the top of a hill
  • A last supper, where the Messiah’s followers are told of their mission to spread the word
  • Baptism. Even Jesus was supposedly baptized by John the Baptist.

All of these myths predate Jesus or are part of competing cult religions in the first two centuries of Christianity. I find it quite fascinating that so many people can take the Bible so seriously, when there is so much evidence that Christianity is such a conglomeration of other mythological belief systems with most of the surviving documents written so far after the events they describe that most all of it should be called into question by even the most slightly skeptical among us.

Oh, wait, I forgot… Religion encourages unquestioning belief without (or in opposition to) actual evidence, and discourages skeptical, critical thinking.

Part three of the series is called “The Apocalypse”. No doubt that the trilogy finale will be full of provable facts and not pure myth or speculation. I look forward to that one tomorrow…

1Long live October 13, ’07!

 
  • jacob

    Amen.

  • http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/ erik

    YouTube, the present day knights against copyright law, to the rescue!

    The Secret Bible – Part 1 – The Knights Templar: 1 2 3 4 5

    Strangely, the more controversial second part is unavailable.

    Torrents of all three parts, for those of you with the knowledge to use them, available here:

    Part 1 – The Knights Templar
    Part 2 – Rivals of Jesus
    Part 3 – The Apocalypse

  • http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/ erik

    Okay, I’ve seen Part 3. Well, as much of it as I could stand. It shouldn’t surprise me that they pay special attention to the crazy “literalist” interpretations of the Book of Revelations (I did learn that “apocalypse” is the Greek name for “revelation”). They had special effects of storms and fire raining down from the sky. But that’s what they’re selling! Entertainment! What pisses me off is that they sell the entertainment under the guise of truth, instead of following every nutcase with a theology professor saying how ridiculous such claims are, like they should do.

    Anyway, I stopped watching after the narrator coughed up this gem:

    If the world began with a big bang, it might end without a sound. The only sign? Every Christian will disappear, beamed up to heaven in the blink of an eye.

    There goes any respect I had for the SciFi National Geographic Channel.

  • fodio

    Jesus is the king of kings,the son of God and the prince of peace,….anyone who has a problem with that could just as well kill himself/herself to find out…

  • http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/ Erik R.

    Thank you, fodio, for that well-argued proposition.

  • jake

    Despite the eye-opening “Jesus wasnÂ’t the only ‘messiahÂ’ who was born on December 25th and rose from the dead after three days???” <– you are wrong, nothing in the documentary claimed that the others were born december 25th and rose from the dead.In fact, the Documentary showed how horribly the others failed. the possibility of someone to claim the messaiah title is high. The old testament speaks of a messiah comming, its normal for some crazy bastards to claim to be “that” messiah for political and other needs. However, the fact that ‘JESUS’ succeeded up to now, the documentary just added to the justification that Jesus is the true messiah

    • Chhese Women

      yes, that is very true. Jesus was the only Messiah born on the 25th december ect. 
      lots of different people claimed to be the messiah and no one believed them. people started to doubt why jesus was so special. ok he could perform so called ‘miricles’ but so could some other people.

  • aquariumdrinker

    Jake, what is it you are saying Jesus has succeeded at? He has succeeded at being a popular story, but by that standard he’s far back in line behind Odysseus, Moses, the Buddha, etc.

    Really, Jesus only had one post-crucifixion job: coming back to earth to lead the faithful into eschaton. Despite having 2,000 years to do it, and despite his basically having promised to be back in a jiff, the faithful are still waiting.

    Over the course of human history, many have claimed that they would transcend death. The fact that a lot of people are still thinking that Jesus will actually do it, despite all evidence to the contrary, says more about their gullibility than about Jesus’s successfulness.