<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dan Brown&#8217;s The Lost Symbol is Anti-Science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://erikras.com/2009/10/05/dan-browns-the-lost-symbol-is-anti-science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://erikras.com/2009/10/05/dan-browns-the-lost-symbol-is-anti-science/</link>
	<description>Thoughts and photos from an American living in Spain.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 07:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eternally Learning</title>
		<link>http://erikras.com/2009/10/05/dan-browns-the-lost-symbol-is-anti-science/#comment-8640</link>
		<dc:creator>Eternally Learning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 14:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/?p=3171#comment-8640</guid>
		<description>Just finished reading it, and couldn&#039;t agree more with this post.  The only reason I didn&#039;t see the reveal of what the &quot;Lost Symbol&quot; was, was because I didn&#039;t think Brown would have been that uninteresting.  I kept waiting for the characters to reveal the &quot;real&quot; meaning of it.  Also, were the big twists as predictable to anyone else?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just finished reading it, and couldn&#8217;t agree more with this post.  The only reason I didn&#8217;t see the reveal of what the &#8220;Lost Symbol&#8221; was, was because I didn&#8217;t think Brown would have been that uninteresting.  I kept waiting for the characters to reveal the &#8220;real&#8221; meaning of it.  Also, were the big twists as predictable to anyone else?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: God</title>
		<link>http://erikras.com/2009/10/05/dan-browns-the-lost-symbol-is-anti-science/#comment-8624</link>
		<dc:creator>God</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 07:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/?p=3171#comment-8624</guid>
		<description>Hi man!  How do you do? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi man!  How do you do? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://erikras.com/2009/10/05/dan-browns-the-lost-symbol-is-anti-science/#comment-4617</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 23:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/?p=3171#comment-4617</guid>
		<description>Well done. I have just started reading and feel a little disappointed by the premise.

It feels like reading &quot;the Secret.&quot; or any new age cult.

I guess he writes what people buy, and i wish there were more skeptics out there.

Best of luck,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done. I have just started reading and feel a little disappointed by the premise.</p>
<p>It feels like reading &#8220;the Secret.&#8221; or any new age cult.</p>
<p>I guess he writes what people buy, and i wish there were more skeptics out there.</p>
<p>Best of luck,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik R.</title>
		<link>http://erikras.com/2009/10/05/dan-browns-the-lost-symbol-is-anti-science/#comment-4616</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/?p=3171#comment-4616</guid>
		<description>Nice try, Escorpiuser.  As I know you are a Spaniard, I will explain this with Spanish.  This is the difference between &lt;em&gt;ser&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;estar&lt;/em&gt; in English.  It comes up rarely (I never noticed it until just this moment!), but it&#039;s there.  &quot;Opened&quot;, when used as a past-participle (e.g. &quot;I have opened my mind.&quot;), implies action, therefore it would use &lt;em&gt;ser&lt;/em&gt;, i.e. &lt;em&gt;ser abierto&lt;/em&gt;.  But &quot;open&quot;, as a past participle, is a &lt;em&gt;state of being&lt;/em&gt;, in which case it would use &lt;em&gt;estar&lt;/em&gt;, i.e. &lt;em&gt;estar abierto&lt;/em&gt;.  Both of these are past participles (as I understand the concept), but &quot;opened&quot; doesn&#039;t work for &quot;minded&quot;, which is a state of being.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice try, Escorpiuser.  As I know you are a Spaniard, I will explain this with Spanish.  This is the difference between <em>ser</em> and <em>estar</em> in English.  It comes up rarely (I never noticed it until just this moment!), but it&#8217;s there.  &#8220;Opened&#8221;, when used as a past-participle (e.g. &#8220;I have opened my mind.&#8221;), implies action, therefore it would use <em>ser</em>, i.e. <em>ser abierto</em>.  But &#8220;open&#8221;, as a past participle, is a <em>state of being</em>, in which case it would use <em>estar</em>, i.e. <em>estar abierto</em>.  Both of these are past participles (as I understand the concept), but &#8220;opened&#8221; doesn&#8217;t work for &#8220;minded&#8221;, which is a state of being.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Escorpiuser</title>
		<link>http://erikras.com/2009/10/05/dan-browns-the-lost-symbol-is-anti-science/#comment-4615</link>
		<dc:creator>Escorpiuser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/?p=3171#comment-4615</guid>
		<description>What about &quot;opened-minded&quot;??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about &#8220;opened-minded&#8221;??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Brown fan</title>
		<link>http://erikras.com/2009/10/05/dan-browns-the-lost-symbol-is-anti-science/#comment-4614</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Brown fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 16:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/?p=3171#comment-4614</guid>
		<description>Very nice., I like the review but I already have read the book and I must say I like the plot in Angels and Deamons a lot better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice., I like the review but I already have read the book and I must say I like the plot in Angels and Deamons a lot better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Secrets of The Lost Symbol</title>
		<link>http://erikras.com/2009/10/05/dan-browns-the-lost-symbol-is-anti-science/#comment-4613</link>
		<dc:creator>Secrets of The Lost Symbol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 20:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/?p=3171#comment-4613</guid>
		<description>Hi Erik

Some very interesting thoughts!

Would you mind getting in touch?

SOLS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Erik</p>
<p>Some very interesting thoughts!</p>
<p>Would you mind getting in touch?</p>
<p>SOLS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Escorpiuser</title>
		<link>http://erikras.com/2009/10/05/dan-browns-the-lost-symbol-is-anti-science/#comment-4612</link>
		<dc:creator>Escorpiuser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 00:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/?p=3171#comment-4612</guid>
		<description>Wow! What a scientific and analytic mind, Erik...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! What a scientific and analytic mind, Erik&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://erikras.com/2009/10/05/dan-browns-the-lost-symbol-is-anti-science/#comment-4611</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 21:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/?p=3171#comment-4611</guid>
		<description>Damn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik R.</title>
		<link>http://erikras.com/2009/10/05/dan-browns-the-lost-symbol-is-anti-science/#comment-4610</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 20:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/blog/?p=3171#comment-4610</guid>
		<description>What are you, a bloody English teacher?  I agree completely. It should be the past participle, &quot;closed&quot;.  To be honest, I tried them both without a hyphen (eventually this word will no longer need the hyphen, as is the nature of compound word evolution), but the spellchecker disliked them both.  You are very right.  My proof reader is going to get a pay cut.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are you, a bloody English teacher?  I agree completely. It should be the past participle, &#8220;closed&#8221;.  To be honest, I tried them both without a hyphen (eventually this word will no longer need the hyphen, as is the nature of compound word evolution), but the spellchecker disliked them both.  You are very right.  My proof reader is going to get a pay cut.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

